September 27, 2026 10:39 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation
Salman Khan
Image Cr: Salman Khan/Twitter

Bombay HC to hear afresh Salman Khan defamation plea

| @indiablooms | Nov 04, 2022, at 01:19 am

Mumbai/UNI: The Bombay High Court will hear afresh a defamation petition filed by actor Salman Khan against his neighbour as the judge who had partly heard his plea is retiring on Friday.

Justice CV Bhadang who had earlier reserved his order, on Thursday said it would not be possible to pronounce order on an appeal filed by Salman in the defamation suit due to paucity of time.

Justice Bhadang had in August begun the hearing on the appeal against a lower court order of March 2022.

The lower court had refused to restrain Ketan Kakkad, who owns land near Salman's farmhouse in Panvel, from posting derogatory videos against the actor.

It had also refused to direct Kakkad to delete his earlier YouTube videos.

On Oct. 11, Justice Bhadang closed the matter for orders after arguments were over.

In his order Justice Bhadang said, "Unfortunately, I am unable to complete the judgement. I tried my level best till last evening.

"But unfortunately there was vacation and then administrative work, and I had other assignments. I will have to list this as part heard.

"I understand the apprehension of the parties and that substantial time and effort went into this. I would have loved to decide this case either way. Unfortunately this came at the fag end of my career."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.