August 11, 2026 10:26 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Jharkhand student protest turns tense: Water cannons, lathicharge after Assembly march barricades breached | ‘Mother tongue is as pure as one's mother’: Vijay-led Tamil Nadu government makes Tamil Thaai Vazhthu mandatory in big language push | Indian envoy Kwatra cites US, UK laws to counter ‘myths’ around FCRA Bill | Jharkhand students march to assembly today: JPSC row escalates despite govt action | ‘A morning I will cherish’: Raghav Chadha meets PM Modi, shares photos from ‘enriching’ meeting | Delhi Mercedes crash kills 70-year-old woman: Cop’s son behind wheel, beer bottle found | Indian-origin woman accused of ‘visa fraud’ on X: US Attorney steps in with major clarification | US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill: India can face Trump’s 100% tariff threat | Expired meat, rotten vegetables found at Bengaluru's luxury hotels, legal action begins | 'I'm ready to be humiliated': Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin clash in Tamil Nadu Assembly over Cauvery dispute

Child born out of marriage between Muslim man and Hindu woman legitimate, but wedlock irregular: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jan 23, 2019, at 12:43 pm

New Delhi, Jan 23 (IBNS): The Supreme Court has ruled that a child who is born out of a marriage between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman is legitimate though such a wedlock is irregular, media reports said.

The child is therefore entitled to inherit his father's property, said the top court.

A bench of Justices NV Ramana and Mohan M Shantanagoudar ruled the child is legitimate though the Mohammedan Law holds such a marriage as an "irregular" one.

The court's observation has been quoted by The Indian Express, "Thus, based on the above consistent view, we conclude that the marriage of a Muslim man with an idolater or fire­worshipper is neither a valid (sahih) nor a void (batil) marriage, but is merely an irregular (fasid) marriage. Any child born out of such wedlock (fasid marriage) is entitled to claim a share in his father’s property."

"It would not be out of place to emphasise at this juncture that since Hindus are idol worshippers, which includes worship of physical images/statues through offering of flowers, adornment, etc., it is clear that the marriage of a Hindu female with a Muslim male is not a regular or valid (sahih) marriage, but merely an irregular (fasid) marriage," the bench has been quoted by The Indian Express.

Citing the legal effect of such an irregular marriage, the apex court said the 'Hindu' wife, however, cannot inherit her husband's property.

The Supreme Court gave the ruling while hearing a petition filed by one Shamsudeen, who is a son of a Muslim father and a Hindu mother, over a property dispute with his cousin.

The top court upheld the verdict of the trial court and Kerala High Court which ruled Shamsudeen is a legitimate son of his parents.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.