September 09, 2026 02:10 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Eiffel Tower staff strike after female workers 'sidelined' during Hindu group visit | ‘When will character assassination of women stop?’ Kangana Ranaut amid Udhayanidhi-Trisha row | 11 arms instead of 10! Suvendu Adhikari apologises over Durga image in Bengal govt ad amid Bageshwar Baba row | ‘Meat is core to Shakta Hinduism’: PM Modi adviser hits back at Bageshwar Baba over non-veg ban appeal | ‘No one can dictate what Bengalis eat’: BJP’s blunt message amid Bageshwar Baba’s Durga Puja food row | Delhi hostel collapse: Owner detained after seven die in Satya Niketan tragedy | No Muslims, Aadhaar card and tilak mandatory: VHP lays down rules for Garba, Dandiya in Maharashtra | 'No non-veg near Durga Puja pandals': Bageshwar Baba's big Bengal appeal sparks controversy | 'Law will take its action': Vijay's zero tolerance on insulting women weeks after Udhayanidhi's arrest | Delhi Metro's big warning to content creators: Don't try this viral stunt or face action
Nora | Jacqueline
Images Instagrammed by Nora Fatehi & Jacqueline Fernandez

Delhi court to hear Nora Fatehi's defamation case against Jacqueline Fernandez on Jan 21

| @indiablooms | Dec 20, 2022, at 05:07 am

New Delhi/IBNS/UNI: A Delhi court has listed for Jan 21 the hearing of a defamation complaint filed by Nora Fatehi against Jacqueline Fernandez on the allegation of defaming her name into an Rs. 200 crore money laundering case involving conman Sukesh Chandrashekar.

Metropolitan Magistrate Kapil Gupta listed the matter for Jan 21 to decide whether to take cognisance of the complaint or not.

Nora, a Canadian citizen submitted through her complaint that a defamatory statement was made by Fernandez with mala fide intention and was circulated by the media houses made accused in the complaint with an intent to defame her.

Nora claimed that her rival actor and the media organisations "were acting in connivance with each other".

"A conspiracy by the accused No. 1 (Jacqueline Fernandez) to ensure the financial, social, and personal downfall of the complainant was hatched, and enacted by the said action," Nora had said in the petition filed through her lawyer.

"Her (Nora Fatehi's) rapidly progressing career quite obviously has threatened her rivals who are unable to compete with her on a fair footing," the petition said.

"It has started to become evident that the aforementioned rivals being unable to compete with the complainant fairly in the industry have started to try and tarnish her reputation which would cause her loss of work and hence would open up greener pastures for her rivals in the industry," it added.

Jacqueline was summoned by the ED several times in connection with the investigation and has been named as an accused in the supplementary charge sheet.

On Aug 31, the court took cognisance of the supplementary charge sheet filed by the Enforcement Directorate and asked her to appear before it.

She was not arrested in this case and was granted bail by the court on Nov 15.

On Dec 2, emerging from the Enforcement Directorate office after recording her statement, Nora had denied receiving any gifts from Sukesh.

Jacqueline had earlier in a plea before the Appellate Authority of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, or PMLA, clearly stated that it is surprising that like her some other celebrities like Nora and other celebrities who received gifts from Sukesh Chandrashekhar are made witnesses, she is sought to be dragged as an accused.

The ED in its supplementary chargesheet filed in the extortion case against conman Sukesh in a Delhi Court has mentioned Jacqueline Fernandez's name as an accused.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.