December 19, 2025 04:45 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Worst is over,’ says IndiGo CEO after flight chaos; staff told to ignore speculation | Chaos at Hyderabad's Lulu Mall! Nidhhi Agerwal swarmed by fans, police register case | TCS bets big on AI, shares spike as company reveals ambitious plan | Delhi goes into emergency mode! Work from home, vehicle bans as AQI hits ‘severe’ | Massive fire guts shanties near Eco Park in Kolkata; no casualties | Indian Visa Application Centre in Dhaka shuts down early amid rising security concerns | Market update: Sensex tumbles 120 points, Nifty below 25,850 at closing bell | ‘Won’t apologise’: Prithviraj Chavan stands firm on controversial Operation Sindoor remark despite backlash | India summons Bangladesh High Commissioner after provocative 'seven sisters' remark | Amazon eyes $10 billion investment in OpenAI — a gamechanger for AI industry!
Photo: Facebook/Rahul Gandhi

Rahul Gandhi can't be witness against himself: Pune Court dismisses plea in defamation case

| @indiablooms | Jul 03, 2025, at 09:30 pm

A Pune court has rejected a petitioner's request to obtain a copy of a book that Congress MP Rahul Gandhi cited during his speech in March 2023, which led to a defamation case against the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, media reports said.

Satyaki Savarkar, the grandnephew of Vinayak Savarkar, filed a petition in a special MP/MLA court in Pune, seeking a copy of the book that Gandhi used while attacking Vinayak Savarkar.

Rejecting the plea, the court said that the "accused cannot be compelled to be a witness against himself, nor can he be compelled to produce incriminating material against him."

It said the trial has not yet started, so the defence cannot be compelled to disclose documents.

"... The burden of proof lies entirely on the complainant. The accused is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. If the application is allowed, it would cause serious prejudice to the accused's right to a fair trial and his right to defend himself effectively," judicial magistrate first class Amol Shriram Shinde said in the order.

"Forcing the defence to prematurely disclose defence materials is neither permitted under criminal procedure nor compatible with constitutional guarantees. It would violate the constitutional right provided under Article 20(3) of the Constitution," the court said.

The defamation case against Gandhi alleged that he had on several occasions maligned Vinayak Savarkar, and one particular incident in March 2023 during a speech in the UK crossed the limit.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.