August 29, 2026 05:19 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Clean my shoes’: Greater Noida woman detained after alleged abuse, assault of security guards | 21-year-old model stabbed to death in Delhi; gym trainer arrested after encounter | Abhishek Banerjee, Derek O'Brien, other TMC leaders booked after Camac Street clash with Kolkata Police | Kanpur plane crash: Training aircraft crashes near Ganges, two pilots killed | Big IT boost for Bengal: LTM opens global delivery & AI centre in Kolkata's New Town | 21-year-old Delhi model found stabbed at Delhi home, gym trainer accused of killing her | ‘Who is stopping her from wearing what she wants?’: Kangana Ranaut hits back at Kriti Sanon over Raksha Bandhan ad | 300 Indians missing in Nepal flash floods, 160 dead: Foreign Minister reveals grim toll | Supreme Court directs Tarun Tejpal to surrender within two weeks | Supreme Court notice to 20 rebel TMC MPs in disqualification plea
Sexual Assault

'Skin-to-skin' contact not needed to define sexual assault under POCSO Act: SC

| @indiablooms | Nov 18, 2021, at 07:30 pm

New Delhi/UNI/IBNS: The Supreme Court in its judgement on Thursday set aside a Bombay High Court verdict, which had held that "skin-to-skin contact is essential for POCSO offences".

"Giving narrow meaning of physical contact to confine it to 'skin-to-skin contact' will defeat the purpose of POCSO Act and it cannot be accepted, '' said the court and convicted two accused to various jail terms who had inappropriately touched a minor girl.

A bench headed by Justice Uday Umesh Lalit passed the judgement, "Skin-to-skin contact is not essential for POCSO offence as held by the Bombay High Court" and disposed of an appeal filed.

In January this year, the Bombay High Court had controversially passed a judgement stating groping a minor's breast without a skin-to-skin contact cannot be considered as a sexual assault.

The National Commission for Women (NCW) had filed a plea in the top court against the judgement.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.