March 12, 2026 09:26 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals | 'Book withdrawn': NCERT apologises for controversial judiciary chapter after Supreme Court ban | Indian stock market surges as Brent crude dips below $100 after Trump’s Iran remarks | Australia grants asylum to five Iranian women footballers after anthem protest; Albanese says ‘they are safe here’ | Trump administration labels Afghanistan ‘state sponsor of wrongful detention’ | Trump threatens Iran with ‘20 times harder’ strike if oil flow through Strait of Hormuz is disrupted
COVID-19

Supreme Court asks Centre to compensate families of COVID-19 victims

| @indiablooms | Jun 30, 2021, at 07:24 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Centre to pay compensation to the families of COVID-19 victims and said that the onus of deciding the amount lies with the government.

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan and MR Shah directed the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) to frame guidelines on the ex-gratia compensation within six weeks so that at least some amount of compensation can be paid.

The apex court has also asked the Centre to issue death certificates to the Covid-19 deceased, specifying the pandemic as the cause of the deaths and create insurance policies for medical treatment of the disease.

It further said that the NDMA failed to do its statutory duty to prescribe minimum standards, adding, "We gave considered the relevant provisions of the Disaster Management Act. The word used "shall" under the DM Act is mandatory...There's nothing on record to show that any such guidelines have been issued by the NDMA.

"It is a mandatory statutory duty of the NDMA to prescribe minimum standards of relief plus ex gratia compensation. It can be said that the national authority has failed to do its duty. The question is whether the court can direct the government to pay a particular ex gratia amount of 4 lakh. We have discussed the scope of judicial review."

"Ex gratia compensation will have financial implications. No state or country has unlimited financial resources. It is not appropriate for this court to direct payment of the particular amount of 4 lakh. Priority is to be fixed by the government," the Supreme Court said.

This ruling came after the Centre, on June 20, told the Apex Court that it cannot pay Rs 4 lakh compensation to the families of those who succumbed to COVID-19 as it would exhaust all the disaster relief funds in response to a PIL filed by Gaurav Kumar Bansal, seeking "minimum standards of relief" and ex-gratia payment to Covid-19 deceased.

The Centre had also maintained that the disaster management law mandated compensation only to natural disasters like earthquakes, floods etc.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.