September 08, 2026 07:19 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Eiffel Tower staff strike after female workers 'sidelined' during Hindu group visit | ‘When will character assassination of women stop?’ Kangana Ranaut amid Udhayanidhi-Trisha row | 11 arms instead of 10! Suvendu Adhikari apologises over Durga image in Bengal govt ad amid Bageshwar Baba row | ‘Meat is core to Shakta Hinduism’: PM Modi adviser hits back at Bageshwar Baba over non-veg ban appeal | ‘No one can dictate what Bengalis eat’: BJP’s blunt message amid Bageshwar Baba’s Durga Puja food row | Delhi hostel collapse: Owner detained after seven die in Satya Niketan tragedy | No Muslims, Aadhaar card and tilak mandatory: VHP lays down rules for Garba, Dandiya in Maharashtra | 'No non-veg near Durga Puja pandals': Bageshwar Baba's big Bengal appeal sparks controversy | 'Law will take its action': Vijay's zero tolerance on insulting women weeks after Udhayanidhi's arrest | Delhi Metro's big warning to content creators: Don't try this viral stunt or face action
Taj Mahal
Image Credit: Souvik Ghosh/IBNS

Supreme Court junks plea on Taj Mahal age

| @indiablooms | Dec 05, 2022, at 06:53 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a PIL seeking determination of the age of the Taj Mahal and removing "wrong facts" about its construction from all text books of the Mughal era monument defined as one of wonders of the world.

A two-judge Bench headed by Justice M R Shah and also comprising Justice C T Ravikumar junked the petition filed by Surjit Singh Yadav and said it was for the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to consider these issues.

"Do not drag the courts into everything. Can we determine the age of the Taj Mahal and the historical facts behind it after 400 years?" the bench asked.

Yadav withdrew the petition.

Justice Shah added: "I don't know even my age. So, how can we hear such petitions?"

"Petition dismissed as withdrawn," the bench said.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.