April 30, 2025 11:57 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bangladesh Supreme Court stays HC order granting bail to Chinmoy Krishna Das in sedition case | After Pahalgam terror attack, India warns Pakistan over 'unprovoked firing' along LoC: Report | PM Modi to skip Russia's Victory Day parade on May 9 in backdrop of Pahalgam attack | PM Modi holds top cabinet meetings amid India's wait for Pahalgam terror attack revenge | Fire in Kolkata hotel kills 14, police constitute SIT; local administration faces heat over 'negligence' | India will attack us in next 24-36 hours, claims Pakistan minister with warning of 'catastrophic consequences' | 3 killed, several injured in shooting incident in Sweden's Uppsala | BREAKING: PM Modi gives 'full freedom' to forces to avenge Pahalgam terror attack | Canada: Indian student Vanshika, who went missing for past few days, found dead | J&K govt closes 48 tourist locations as intel warns of more terror attacks after Pahalgam incident

Supreme Court to hear Ayodhya case on Jan 4

| @indiablooms | Dec 25, 2018, at 11:27 am

New Delhi, Dec 25 (IBNS): The Supreme Court will hear the case, which pertains to whether Ram temple can be built in the disputed land of Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya, on Jan 4, 2019.

Earlier in November, the top court had rejected a plea seeking an urgent hearing of the case.

The Supreme Court will hear pleas challenging Allahabad High Court's verdict which divided 2.77-acre disputed Ayodhya land among Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara.

The apex court will decide whether Ram temple can be built in the same disputed land, where Babri Masjid was held till 1992.

In 1992, the Babri Masjid was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born at that land.

The verdict, if passed prior to 2019 General Elections, will boost up the BJP, whose political commitment was building the Ram temple in Ayodhya.

On Sept 27, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu