October 16, 2026 02:11 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Aamir Khan’s nephew Imran Khan asked to leave India by Oct 28 after joining anti-CEC protest | ‘Their crime? Demanding justice’: Rahul Gandhi slams 4 AM detention of Ankita Bhandari’s parents | ‘Bangladesh showed us the way’: Neha Bora’s remarks spark BJP attack on Rahul Gandhi | Chingrighata flyover skid scare: Bikes fall, anti-skid blocks installed overnight as Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul faces criticism | Meerut blue drum murder case: Muskaan, her lover get death sentence | 'Rise up, young patriots!': American singer Mary Millben alleges CJP gets US funding, urges peaceful protests | 'Won't go unchallenged': Muhammad Yunus heckling in New York triggers legal action warning | flydubai cockpit attack probe widens: Two Maldivian pilots detained in UAE over links to Omani co-pilot | Netflix scores big FIFA deal: All 104 World Cup 2030 matches to stream live in Spain, Andorra | Jantar Mantar crackdown: CJP's Saurav Das, Ashutosh Ranka sent to jail for 5 days

Cinegoers in dilemma over fractured Padmaavat reviews, poor rating by many critics

| | Jan 27, 2018, at 12:23 am

Mumbai, Jan 26 (IBNS): To see or not to see, that is going to be the dilemma for cinegoers if reviews of Padmaavat is any indication even as the jinxed film that faced the wrath of Karni Sena protesters for disrespecting Rani Padmini made it to the theatres across many states in India.

'Padmaavat', the epic drama filmed by director Sanjay Leela Bhansali, has succeeded in earning mixed reviews at best from critics with some praising it while the rest giving it a thumbs down.

Interestingly, those giving it a thumbs down are considered to be reviewers who are respected for their authentic verdicts on films amid the open secret that many positive reviews, especially by one of India's leading dailies, are often considered influenced by other factors.

The Times of India has given four stars, out of five, to the movie, in sharp contrast to other reviews on some of the most respected media platforms.

Khaleej Times wrote about Padmaavat: "The extravagantly mounted Padmaavat is disappointingly numb. Its visual richness, with every frame charted like paintings, don't add up to give that wholesome whole."

NDTV has given two stars to the movie. The TV channel called the movie as a 'slog'.

"Despite Deepika Padukone's Inspired Performance, Sanjay Leela Bhansali's Film Is A Slog," NDTV said enough in the headline of their review, illustrating their not so impressed attitude towards the movie that was earlier scheduled to released on Dec 1.

The Hindu also did not give much positive response towards the film.

"Exaltation of Rajputs, glorification of jauhar, demonisation of Khilji aside, 'Padmaavat' can’t rise above being an overlong snoozefest," The Hindu said in its review.

Rediff.com gave the movie a lowly 1.5 stars out of five.

"The biggest tragedy of Padmaavat is that it has nothing new to offer. We've seen Bhansali create similar picturesque frames before," the website said in its review.

However, a positive review came from The Guardian which called it a fabulous film.

The film, featuring  Deepika Padukone, Shahid Kapoor and Ranveer Singh, received threats over its release from Rajput fringe groups which accused the makers of distorting history.

Vandalism and violence were reported in Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra on Wednesday.

The film was cleared by the CBFC with a few changes, but its screening was banned by some state governments, including Rajasthan, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh.

The Supreme Court later struck down the ban, citing the freedom of expression, and paved the way for its release today.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.